Re: How hard is Java, really? -- WEB400

Subject: Re: How hard is Java, really?
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 09:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Joe P. wrote:
In the thin JSP architecture, you have a single servlet that converts
messages between EBCDIC and Java objects. That servlet is roughly
equivalent to the CGIDEV2 service program ...

Joe,

The servlet you describe seems to be much more robust, and serve a different
purpose than CGIDEV2, but are you saying that under you're architecture that
developers would be using, but not changing, recompiling, or inheriting from
the servlet? If so, what would developers be creating / maintaining? JSP's?
XML mapping definitions?

Nathan.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: How hard is Java, really? , Joe Pluta

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.