WAS server jitc vs jitc

Subject: WAS server jitc vs jitc_de
From: "Mike Cunningham" <mcunning@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 13:09:18 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I have been playing with the new V5R4 web performance advisor and it
recommends using the jitc setting for the java compiler run mode. The
way IBMs web site reads
(http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/iseries/v5r3/index.jsp?topic=/
rzaha/selmod.htm ) it makes it sound like jitc_de is better. We are
currently running jitc_de.

If your running WAS what is your site running?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.

WAS server jitc vs jitc_de