Re: Eliminating sub-128 bit encryption -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Eliminating sub-128 bit encryption
From: "Jones, John (US)" <John.Jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:46:10 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hmm. That list includes 40 (SSL_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC2_CBC_40_MD5) & 56
(SSL_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA) bit methods. Those two explicitly show up as
weak SSL on our penetration tests.

The list also does not include any TLS methods.

I'll add that this particular web server only supports our employees in
the US and thus we can require the use of 128-bit capable browsers.

Over at ignite I found this four year old thread
http://ww2.ignite400.org/Lists/ign_list/Message/20431.html but again the
list still provides for sub-128 bit support.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Eliminating sub-128 bit encryption , Jones, John (US)

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.