Perhaps the copy in one of those other libraries will work? Read my
entire original email.
I did a DSPPGM of the one in QHTTPSVR on my V5R4 system. It's created on
V5R4, for V5R4, and, thus, should have no problems passing ANZOBJCVN.
Matt,
I like your idea but I would have no idea how to construct the parameters.
But, judging by the DSPPGM there are no parameters.
Now I am thinking of two options:
1 - Copy QHTTPSVR/DB2WWW into CGI.
2 - Change all directives to refer to QHTTPSVR and not CGI.
Any reason why we would have been recommended to copy to our user library
in the first place? Perhaps a way to back out of a bug if IBM put out a
bad copy? Just in case IBM DOES delete that program in some future
release? In case IBM gets funny and wants to rename the libraries (like
QHTTPSVR becomes QDG1 or QWAS or whatever the webserver du jour is). If
the recommendation was for any of these reasons, then Matt's suggestion
wouldn't help. If the suggestion was by the truly paranoid then perhaps I
should just change the directives?
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.