Haas, Matt (CL Tech Sv) skrev den 11-06-2008 17:14:
I would be very wary of a GPL license. For better or for worse, GPL is (or at is least viewed as) an anti-commercial political statement as it is a distribution license. We do have a little bit of GPL code here but we don't modify it so for us, GPL isn't much better than closed source commercial software (the obvious advantage being we can look at source when needed for debugging). IMHO, the Apache license is a much better corporate fit.
Some companies have decided on GPL for the OpenSource version and that you can buy a version not under GPL (which is one way to monetize). As Open Source does not mean that you loose copyright the owners can do what they want with their code (at this point).
Would that be an option?


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.