Hi Michael,

My understanding is that the DB2 functions are designed to be general-purpose database functions that work with any DB2 database (including the one on the i). (The DB2 code does support i-specific functionality, such as setting the naming to *SYS.) In other words, the stuff that the Java programmer would typically get from JDBC.

The i5 functions are (if I understand correctly) things that are not general database functions. Stuff like record-level I/O that doesn't exist in other databases (including other DB2 implementations), or the ability to run a program or command, stuff like that. In other words, the type of stuff that Java programmers would get from the JT/400 classes.



Michael Ryan wrote:
And I guess that led to my confusion/choice. I thought the i5
functions were specific or tuned to i5, while the DB2 functions are
for any DB2 implementation. Guess the implementation isn't as complete
for the two function groups.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.