Re: Mapping SQL Result Sets to Browsers -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Mapping SQL Result Sets to Browsers
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 15:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
But for presentation purposes Maps do nicely :)

I actually wanted to bring this up at some point, Thorbjørn. I assumed that the reason for mapping SQL result sets to objects had something to do with implementing business rules and procedures. And I asked Sarah about that. But I also wanted to find out about the next step, which is mapping objects to whatever is streamed to the browser. And your message implies that objects are mapped to JSF components. Would you care to elaborate? Is the mapping automatic, for example?

Nathan.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Mapping SQL Result Sets to Browsers , Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.