|
What's so very interesting to me is that IBM chooses not to develop their
own Flex/Silverlight/JavaFX. Now this is most likely because of their love
of Java, but I feel they forgot how successful they were with their
proprietary 5250 spec/implementation. Adobe/Microsoft/Sun are following in
their footsteps 25 years later and saying it is "new".
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:20:28 -0500
From: aaronbartell@xxxxxxxxx
To: web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [WEB400] The "Presentation" Layer
Wouldn't the preference be to have your OWN thick client, deployed better(more like Flash than iTunes), and get rid of all the issues of client
discrepancies?
BINGO! Better stated than what I said.
What's so very interesting to me is that IBM chooses not to develop their
own Flex/Silverlight/JavaFX. Now this is most likely because of their love
of Java, but I feel they forgot how successful they were with their
proprietary 5250 spec/implementation. Adobe/Microsoft/Sun are following in
their footsteps 25 years later and saying it is "new". The look and feel is
most definitely new, but the infrastructure has been done so many times
before it makes you wonder why Adobe/Microsoft/Sun don't look at how
previous architectures accomplished the task with blazing speed and
efficiency by black boxing things. Also note that for these companies to be
successful they will need to find a solid place to put the median of when to
make things loosely coupled (i.e. use XML as the interface) and when to make
it more "binary" and proprietary. An example of a solution I would love to
see is GWT (Java) communicating with Flex for data entry heaving
applications. In this case the user would download Flex/Flash (similar to
installing a 5250 client) and then be able to communicate with any other
Flex/Flash applications after that because it understands the "Flex data
stream" (which doesn't exist today that I know of but would be simiarl to
the 5250 data stream - just with more bells and whistles)
I have only done a single/simple Flex application to date and from what I
can tell it holds a lot of promise, but they are also "playing with fire"
because they require you to download an entire SWF file of compiled screens
vs. rendering some sort of streamed instructions from the server and having
Flex just be a very thin client layer used solely for rendering and events
back to the server.
Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com
--
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.