Yes, two are the IBM i and the windows. Unless using both improves the solution, the fact that you have already invested in the windows is not a good reason to use it in this proyect.

Walden H. Leverich wrote:

Your point about .Net requiring two or more servers caught my eye and

made me wince.
The _only_ reason I let that line pass was I assumed (perhaps
incorrectly) that the "two" servers he was referring to was one Windows
box as the .Net box and one Power box running IBM i as the DB. I can't
argue that running everything on i will result in fewer boxes.
And you've already got an investment in Windows boxes and admin, no?

-Walden

--
Walden H Leverich III
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x3051
WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.TechSoftInc.com

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.