Walden H. Leverich skrev den 08-08-2008 18:46:
Walden is saying (I think) the Windows model is to have one application/database per server

Perhaps not that far, but that's the general idea. I have no problem
with a file server also being a print server, or an web server also
handling DNS. It's the "applications" that should have their own
servers. For example, a SQLServer shouldn't also be an Exchange server,
or a domain controller shouldn't also be a web server. "Can" you run it
all on one machine? Sure. Something like SBS even forces you to. But
"should" you is another question.
As I understand it the issue is that one rogue program can affect the others. No memory pooling, and no CPU quota.

Please correct me if I am wrong. This might be easily doable in the "server" editions, but I'd rather think that Microsoft wants to sell more Windows licenses.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.