They most definitely could and that is an excellent suggestion as SSL
certs can be multiple hundreds of dollars a year. Actually, self-signed
certs makes a lot more sense in this case because there is already a lot
of "massaging" of the SSL process going on. One of the benefits to having
Verisign (or the like) sign a cert is to save on the mess of having people
install your certificate.

Good catch,
Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com

Jon Paris wrote:

On 11-Dec-08, at 2:32 PM, web400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:



You simply head over to Verisign (or other preferred vendor) and
purchase a
certificate by providing them with some information from your machine
(which should have been saved when SSL was first setup) and then
install
the cert they give back to you on the AS400 using DCM and then
associate
it with the Apache instance that is doing the XML web services.


Since this is an in-house operation Aaron, can't they simply use self-
signed certificates?

Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.