Hi Walden
I really don't see it this way at all.
Sure you can build rich stuff, but doing it is clunky, not standardized and
unproductive. The average developer struggles to get his head around all of
it because there's a lot to learn and too many choices to make.
I don't see these things as applets - I seem them as a rich interface being
delivered into the browser and kind if replacing it by stealth. No-one was
going to easily move away from the browser.
The other thing you can't easily do with HTML and Javascript is provide an
off-line secure sandboxed environment that allows for a local database to
operate transparently with the browser and app and provides off-line or
disconnected operations. Curl and the Google App engine for instance have
this capability built-in (according to the docs).
Regards
Evan Harris
-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Walden H. Leverich
Sent: Wednesday, 24 December 2008 4:24 a.m.
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: Re: [WEB400] JavaFX viability was->Re: Pete's web5250
"XAML and the sun - it the same - don't look directly into it"
LOL... how true. However, even MS will tell you, unless you're a tool
vendor, don't use XAML directly. It's not meant for human consumption,
unless you're one of those uber-geeks that likes to play with fire. Any
_business_ developer that is learning XAML is nuts! Give it a release
and we'll be rather well abstracted away from it.
Having said that, I oppose any move away from HTML! You can get pretty
damn rich (UX wise) with just HTML and javascript. Introducing
Silverlight, Flash, Flex, JavaFX, whatever, is just trying to use
applets and activex again with different names... Didn't work too well
the first time around.
-Walden
midrange.com
