Re: CNAME or A record? -- WEB400

Subject: Re: CNAME or A record?
From: Jon Paris <Jon.Paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:50:34 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 22-Jan-09, at 12:03 PM, web400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Thanks to all for the information - I figured that an A record would be more efficient - and in this case the IP won't change so I'll go with that.

I will also remember the CNAME idea though for my home setup - that could be very useful.

Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.