Probably should start another thread...

The issue comes back to developing *new* applications. Should they be platform/OS dependent or should they be written with multiple platforms in mind? In my particular case, perhaps unique, when I write an application, even though I target the i, I know that selling a new box into a customer's location is an uphill battle. Given my recent experience with IBM's business partner program, if you aren't selling plenty of iron for them, they aren't interested in partnering, so more recently I can't even lead with an i because I can no longer resell them. So, given that I have a battle that is difficult to win, I make sure that my application can run on as many platforms as possible. Java, so far, with JDBC, has been very easy to move from platform to platform with. If there is a JDBC driver, I can use the database. I *try* to use SQL syntax that will work across DB's but there are some things, like the LIMIT clause in MySQL that Scott mentioned, that I have to avoid, or work around, in my applications.

WHY would I even consider a cross platform language like Java vs RPG? Because as much as I love the platform and promote it, I am a realist and I know that it is mostly a non IBM i world out there. It is hard enough to sell into an account that has existing hardware, let alone try to sell and application AND a box. The beauty is, if they are forward looking enough to own an i, I can install on i.

So, to address your concern Matt. When it comes to writing new applications I try to stay as DB and OS agnostic as I can. There is syntax in almost every DB that lacks an analog in another so I avoid those things if I can.

Thanks for the link on the storage engine. That thing has been longer in coming than the Cubs winning another pennant. Oh, wait a minute, we are still waiting on the Cubs.....

Pete


Haas, Matt (CL Tech Sv) wrote:
<snip>
I would guess my substitute dispatching and absence management system could be considered "narrowly scoped" but something like Sugar CRM? Runs on Windows, Linux and i without so much as a difference in a line of code (to my knowledge). I would guess just defining database connections during configuration time is about all it takes.
</snip>

Where the difficulty comes into play is with the database itself and how the applications construct queries. From what I've seen, MySQL has a lot of non-standard syntax for things (especially data types and DDL statements) and it is common for PHP apps to use those items in the queries. Since there isn't some middle layer (like Hibernate or even just JDBC itself) to translate that query into the syntax the target database can understand, you end up with the app tied to MySQL.

What the IBMDB2I storage engine (http://www.ibmsystemsmag.com/ibmi/february09/features/24086p1.aspx) does is essentially handle the translation between MySQL and DB2 without having to manually port the database parts of the app to DB2.

Matt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.