I suppose you (and others) just need to shop around then to get ASP.NET
hosting for similar prices or less (it's not that difficult)

Maurice


-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of lgoodbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 20 May 2009 17:26
To: web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Why ASP.NET gets no Respect

IMO, $100/month is expensive for personal hosting (i.e. not generating
income). In the SMB world it's a bargain. However, I can get LAMP
hosting for $4/month if purchased in a 3-year block. I did a 12-month
block for $6/month ($72/year). The particular hosting service I have
throws in Ruby too.
--Loyd

-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Maurice O'Prey
Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 12:35 AM
To: 'Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries'
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Why ASP.NET gets no Respect

I suppose it is down to what you consider cheap? I rent a server from an
ISP
for 60 GBP, say 93 USD, a month and run 15 web sites off it. You can
host an
ASP.NET application on your PC at home via Broadband for virtually free
if
you want? I wouldn't call that particularly expensive...?

Maurice O'Prey


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.