Re: Portlets and the AS400 -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Portlets and the AS400
From: "Haas, Matt (CL Tech Sv)" <matt.haas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:48:32 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Booth,

I have not noticed performance issues using JDBC. The toolkit drivers are noticeably slower than the native drivers but both perform well.

Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Booth Martin
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 12:37 PM
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: [WEB400] Portlets and the AS400

(Posted originally on Midrange Tech list. It was suggested that this is a better spot for the request.)

I want to write a portlet, store it in the IFS, and have it access data
in DB/2.

I am being told to use JDBC. I am also being told JDBC performs badly.

Any experiences, recommendations, and/or comments would be appreciated.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Portlets and the AS400 , Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.