Re: Ruby on Rails on i site back up -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Ruby on Rails on i site back up
From: Aaron Bartell <aaronbartell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:24:09 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

The preference for convention over configuration has started to work its

way into many other languages and platforms, including some of the recent
Java specifications. JSF 2 and EJB 3 embraced this philosophy and are far
more productive as a result.

So true. In many ways RoR made other frameworks
look embarrassingly complex. Apache's Tapestry was another that was heading
in the direction of RoR and was an answer to JSF's complexity/inflexibility.

Great, now I am starting to get the itch to hop back into these frameworks
again :-) There are MANY bright minds building these frameworks and thus a
ton to learn about the different ways things can be approached.

Aaron Bartell
www.SoftwareSavesLives.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Ruby on Rails on i site back up , Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.