Re: Consumer Based Web Development

[James Perkins <jrperkinsjr@xxxxxxxxx>]

We could install Java 6. It's available on 5.4 and 6.1 which most of our
customers are on. I would like to move to it anyway since Java SE 5 (at
least Sun's implementation) is EOL.

I haven't tried to install GlassFish at all. I assume it would have to use
PASE and that is not my strong point. I should just try it though and see
what happens. We have a development box at 6.1 and it has Java SE 6
installed.

--
James R. Perkins
http://twitter.com/the_jamezp


On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 13:19, Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen <ravn@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> James Perkins skrev:
> > Thorbjorn,
> > I Would love to be able to use JSF 2, but so far we are developing for
> > WebSphere Application Server 6.1 which is not Java EE 5 compliant. I will
> be
> > using Facelets, so it should ease my pain a bit.
> Our JSF application runs under Tomcat and we drag in the JSF-libraries
> ourselves.  Most likely something similar is possible with JSF 2.0 even
> under an older EE server.
>
> We are about to do maintainance on it.  Hopefully I can get around to do
> some real life work with JSF 2 and report back.
>
>
> > Our basic requirements are:
> > It has to run on the IBM i
> > It needs to use standards for easy migration (hopefully) in the future
> Sounds reasonable to me :)
>
> > I guess that's about it. I would love to be able to get GlassFish running
> on
> > the i. Then we could use Java EE 6 :-)
> GlassFish 3 requires AFAIK Java 6.  You got that?
>
> Perhaps a wish to bring up on the java400 list?
>
> --
>   Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen  "...plus... Tubular Bells!"
>
> --
> This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
> To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
> or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.