The devil is usually in the detail of an integration into existing
production that performs well.

So true. This would be much better if a data queue layer were put in front
of it and have it run in a single batch job on the AS400 (which might be
what I end up doing for my customer).

Be warned about running headless java in the same job that may need to load
a PASE routine.

How does java.awt.headless affect anything other than the Java runtime? I
don't know if I have run into the issue you are alluding to.

Aaron Bartell
http://mowyourlawn.com
http://mowyourlawn.com/blog/


On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Peter Connell <
Peter.Connell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Sounds pretty much like the install for the purchased PD4ML product except
images don't need a qualified domain.
Like many things, getting a prototype to run is often straight forward
enough. The devil is usually in the detail of an integration into existing
production that performs well.
Be warned about running headless java in the same job that may need to load
a PASE routine.

Peter



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.