im' sorry but you are wrong, <children> defines an array of childs, try to
express my second
enhanced example in JSON - it is impossible
Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
09-03-2010 20:05
Please respond to
Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To
Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [WEB400] Basic question on XML structure
I should admit that an XML parser wouldn't have any trouble with parsing
either document, and should also admit that the extra <children> node
created by the first structure may not be necessary, but I think it makes
reading and document with the naked eye more intuitive, and reading the
source code for processing the parsed node tree more intuitive, because
the <children> node organizes the data similar to normalized database
structures.
-Nathan.
----- Original Message ----
From: David FOXWELL <David.FOXWELL@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue, March 9, 2010 10:12:45 AM
Subject: [WEB400] Basic question on XML structure
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.