Re: JSF 2.0 a lot better was ->Re: Why use PHP? What are the disadvantages? -- WEB400

Subject: Re: JSF 2.0 a lot better was ->Re: Why use PHP? What are the disadvantages?
From: Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen <ravn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:20:54 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Den 21/04/10 19.59, James Perkins skrev:

Just to add to this, it also doesn't require Java EE 6. You can run it
in Java EE 5.

Yes, and in a plain servlet 2.5 container like a newish Tomcat, but you have to carry the implementation libraries with you in your WAR file.

Actually I am planning on skipping Tomcat and Jetty for deployments and switch to a small embeddable servlet container named Winstone. This is simply to get better control over where stuff goes, and when we are rid of JSP's we can manage with a JRE which makes this trivially simple to install and maintain.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.