Re: JSF 2.0 a lot better was ->Re: Why use PHP? What are the disadvantages? -- WEB400

Subject: Re: JSF 2.0 a lot better was ->Re: Why use PHP? What are the disadvantages?
From: Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen <ravn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:49:21 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Den 21/04/10 20.31, BButterworth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx skrev:

It's good to know you all are having positive experiences with JSF 2.0. If
I learn it, it will be on my own time. I'm trying to learn as much as
possible about various (web) languages and frameworks to know the pros and
cons even though I have little professional experience with Java web
development. In terms of JSF 2.0 development, I have been waiting on Geary
and Horstmann's book to come out, but it keeps getting delayed. If you
have any good advice regarding online resources or books, please let me
know.

This one is very concise (and written by Horstmann). Registration required.

http://refcardz.dzone.com/refcardz/javaserver-faces-20

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.