Re: IBM proposes EGL go open source;

[Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen <ravn@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Den 29/06/10 16.01, Kelly Cookson skrev:
> For example, the open source version can't compile EGL to COBOL. That doesn't seem to be a big deal to me, since we have the traditional COBOL compiler and can develop COBOL programs the old-fashioned way. But maybe I'm missing something.
>    
Thats interesting.

I was envisioning the other day that it would be possible for customers 
to put business-rules together in EGL with consultants, and have the 
result forwarded back to the mothership and baked to be a compiled Cobol 
module which could then be distributed out to the above customer as part 
of a code release or automatically shipped out.

Oh well.