Re: Which scales better? J2EE, PHP, or CGIDEV2? -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Which scales better? J2EE, PHP, or CGIDEV2?
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 10:03:09 -0700 (PDT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

From: Aaron Bartell
If you load enough into the TCP/IP queue it (the IBM i
server) will eventually just start rejecting requests.

Just ought to clarify that each instance of an IBM i HTTP server can be
configured to run up to 9999 concurrent threads, and can be configured to drop
TCP/IP connections after serving responses, rather than keeping connections
alive.

-Nathan

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Which scales better? J2EE, PHP, or CGIDEV2? , Aaron Bartell
Re: Which scales better? J2EE, PHP, or CGIDEV2? , Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.