Ah, OK :-)
So if your server is choking because you're using all of its capacity you can code your way out of it ? Hmmmmm......
Sometimes it does take more hardware not just more coding whether using Microsoft or IBM technologies.
Don't blame Microsoft for poor coding or inferior hardware issues :-)
Regards,
Richard Schoen
RJS Software Systems Inc.
Where Information Meets Innovation
Document Management, Workflow, Report Delivery, Forms and Business Intelligence
Email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web Site:
http://www.rjssoftware.com
Tel: (952) 736-5800
Fax: (952) 736-5801
Toll Free: (888) RJSSOFT
----------------------------------------------------------------------
message: 1
date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 13:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
from: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [WEB400] Microsoft .NET frontending IBM i
From: Richard Schoen
Actually going back to the original thread this is a good example of
scalability which in this case happens to be using Windows servers.
Adding more servers to a server farm is not my idea of responding to increasing workloads "gracefully". Throwing more hardware at a performance problem is not my idea of scalability. It's more a symptom that the system is NOT scalable.
Anybody can add a new server and route requests to it.
Of course, Microsoft is working from a different play book.
-Nathan
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.