Re: Microsoft .NET frontending IBM i

[Steve Richter <stephenrichter@xxxxxxxxx>]

big advantage to using C# is that it is pretty much identical to javascript.

On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Maurice O'Prey <Maurice.Oprey@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> VB, but will probably make the C# leap one day!
>
> Maurice
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Richard Schoen
> Sent: 10 October 2010 01:20
> To: web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [WEB400] Microsoft .NET frontending IBM i
>
> No reason not to shamelessly promote.  I do when the request warrants it :)
>
> Yeah, I gave up on native ASP.Net too when I found out IBM had done the
> work, but wouldn't let it out the door.  The lukewarm response from
> Rochester this summer sealed the deal :)
>
> The closest we got was using the Mainsoft technology which is cool because
> you actually DO develop in Visual Studio and they convert it to Java
> runtimes.
>
> We've used Mainsoft for a few production applications, but it's still easier
> to deploy .Net on a Windows server and it's much more mainstream as well.
>
> Do you guys use VB or C# for language of choice ?
>
> I've found that most RPGers gravitate towards VB because the syntax is a
> little simpler.  Include me in that camp as well even though I do a lot of
> Java too :)
>
> Regards,
> Richard Schoen
> RJS Software Systems Inc.
> Where Information Meets Innovation
> Document Management, Workflow, Report Delivery, Forms and Business
> Intelligence
> Email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Web Site: http://www.rjssoftware.com<http://www.rjssoftware.com/>
> Tel: (952) 736-5800
> Fax: (952) 736-5801
> Toll Free: (888) RJSSOFT
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> Hi Richard
>
> First point, our web site is ancient and was put together in 10 minutes (we
> produce good web applications for our customers but our own web site comes
> way down the list of development priorities!).
>
> I don't think our site suggests anything magical? We do obviously run
> ASP.NET on Windows servers and just use a database access layer to
> communicate with either DB2 or SQL Server (the choice is made at table
> level). We simply use the IBM provider like any others. We do implement data
> caching to reduce the number of calls to the DB2 database (or SQL database)
> but really the complexity lies in the application design and business logic
> just as it would in any other scenario.
>
> As regards to running .NET natively on the iSeries I gave up that dream a
> long time ago, and if my verbiage suggests that we do then I best change the
> wording a.s.a.p. (new site will be along soon).
>
> P.S. I am not promoting my business in this group (you would have to be
> kidding!!).
>
> Regards
>
> Maurice
> --
> This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
> To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
> or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.
>
> --
> This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
> To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
> or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.