No, it's your job to define the scope of what is being done and what
audience is being served. The only thing really clear so far is that
you believe the i scales better because you can "add cores".

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:10 AM, Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Evan Harris
It's simplistic to dismiss the server farm as being "too complex"
without defining or understanding what that is bringing to the table.

Wouldn't that be your job to define what a server farm brings to the table?
 Nearly all my applications are written in RPG.  They receive browser requests
and respond with formatted output (HTML, XML, JSON, injected JavaScript) at
about the same speed that QZDASOINIT jobs process SQL statements and respond
with ODBC formatted output.  In that context, a server farm is a waste of space.

-Nathan




--
This is the Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.






As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.