Re: Why the IBM i *might* not be a good web server -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Why the IBM i *might* not be a good web server
From: David FOXWELL <David.FOXWELL@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:12:07 +0100
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

-----Message d'origine-----
[mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Kevin Turner

I cannot work out which bits of this post are quotes and
which bits are additional comments :-(

I'm also having trouble following, I think they were saying something about IBM i being useless for serving beans on toast.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Why the IBM i *might* not be a good web server , Maurice O'Prey

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.