Not sure of any sites, but you should know that if you are using the iSeries to host the data that feeds your IIS server that it takes a HUGE amount of overhead (in the area of 40% of cpu utilization in some instances!) when serving this data. If you are so inclined, and you do this, check out how many QZDASOINIT jobs you have and how much cpu overhead it takes up.

We are in the middle of moving all of our web sites back to our 400. We hired a programmer who is ASPX/PHP savvy and he will be converting all of our ASP/ASPX code to PHP.

/b;

-----Original Message-----
From: web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:web400-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rich Dotson
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 8:52 PM
To: web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [WEB400] iSeries vs IIS web site


Because our web site is so bad and we do not have anyone to develop it I am trying to convenience management to allow me to pursue setting up our iSeries and developing our web site on our iSeries. The individual in charge of our network is 'talking down' the iSeries as a web server. Is there a web site, white paper or any document comparing the advantages and disadvantages of using an iSeries vs some other web server. I am just starting my research and need as much information as possible to make my side of the argument.
Thanks,Rich Dotson

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.