Re: iSeries vs IIS web site -- WEB400

Subject: Re: iSeries vs IIS web site
From: Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen <ravn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:16:08 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Den 12/04/11 17.02, Bryce Martin skrev:

hahahaha. That figures. The guys is trying to tell your President that
IIS is more secure than the IBM i.... ohh boy. hahahahaha.

You need to ask the network guy in what ways the IIS server is more secure
than the IBM i. Press him on it... make him give examples of how IBM i
can be hacked and IIS cannot. Oh please report back with his answer,
because this HAS to be good :D

In the default configuration the IBM i is rather fragile.

Are you familiar with this Blackhat presentation?

http://www.blackhat.com/presentations/bh-europe-06/bh-eu-06-Carmel/bh-eu-06-Carmel.pdf

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: iSeries vs IIS web site , John Jones

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.