Re: Mobile Development for the i

[Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Nathan.  No, I didn't post on Midrange-L.  Given the potentially 
inflammatory nature of Android vs. Apple, I didn't want to get embroiled 
in another controversy.  I figured this list was a bit more focused and 
people would appreciate it.

Then again, EGL got kicked off of this list.  I'll never understand that 
one - IBM develops a web language with specific features for the IBM i 
and it's not relevant to the IBM i Web Enabling list?  ;)

Joe

> Joe, I just read your article and should return a compliment. It was more
> thoroughly researched and more balanced than one typically finds on the
> internet. There's a lot of good reference material there, especially when one
> follows the embedded links. It covers a lot more than just Web interfaces. Did
> you post a link on Midrange-L? I sense that web and mobile interfaces are
> becoming so mainstream that they are a topic of general interest; can't be
> relegated to a specialized list.
>
> -Nathan
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Joe Pluta<joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries<web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tue, May 10, 2011 6:52:48 AM
> Subject: [WEB400] Mobile Development for the i
>
> MC Press just published my latest article on mobile app development.  It
> touches on the pros and cons of Rich UI development, and then goes on to
> native development comparing Apple vs. Android.  Nothing extensive, but
> it's a good introduction to the various strategies.
>
> http://www.mcpressonline.com/networking/wireless-mobile/go-wireless-take-control-from-anywhere-at-any-time.html
>
>
> Joe