Re: WAS Upgrade 6.1 or 7.0? -- WEB400

Subject: Re: WAS Upgrade 6.1 or 7.0?
From: Jim Oberholtzer <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:14:29 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Already moving to the 32bit version. This application did not need the 64bit version anyway.

Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects

On 9/8/2011 12:41 PM, Stefan Tageson wrote:

If you can't go to WAS 8, I would definitely go to WAS 7. WAS 6.x is
> based on Java EE 1.4 which is quite awful. Also WAS 6.1 uses Java 5
> which was EOL'd almost 3 years ago.
>

I agree. And don't forget to remember to switch to the j9 jvms (32 or 64bit) before the upgrade to i os 7.
I've been in trouble when going from v5r4 to i7 while still on 64 bit classic jvms.
Took some time in telephone with a gentleman from Rochester to sort things out afterwards.

Best regards

Stefan Tageson

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: WAS Upgrade 6.1 or 7.0? , Dean, Robert

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.