That's cool. I would assume they would have to accommodate the tunnel scenario unless I was entering the Chunnel.......................................................I'm back. Where's my connection :-)
Regards,
Richard Schoen
RJS Software Systems Inc.
Where Information Meets Innovation
Document Management, Workflow, Report Delivery, Forms and Business Intelligence
Email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web Site:
http://www.rjssoftware.com
Tel: (952) 736-5800
Fax: (952) 736-5801
Toll Free: (888) RJSSOFT
------------------------------
message: 5
date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 08:42:14 +0100
from: Kevin Turner <kevin.turner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [WEB400] Websockets on the IBMi
I can't speak for all implementations obviously, but the client side coding for jwebsockets caters for the sort of disconnects you describe. Once you make the connection, if it disconnects unexpectedly then it will reconnect automatically as soon as it can. It will then process any events that are pending (optionally). It should cope with the "going through a tunnel" scenario. Of course, if the connection has suffered a more permanent problem, all bets are off (stateless or not).
Since I am dealing with an intranet function it is not such a problem for me.
On 12 Jul 2012, at 02:44, "Richard Schoen" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
midrange.com
