Re: Web Enabling Applications - new Wiki page -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Web Enabling Applications - new Wiki page
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:07:50 -0800 (PST)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Web Enabling the AS400 / iSeries <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

"Suitable for 5250 Migration" is completely left open to
interpretation, too. What is the criteria for "suitable"? And what is
considered a "migration"?

Good point. It's a given that anyone can migrate from green screens to browsers using ANY tool while retaining essential functionality. But how much work is involved? There's the ad claiming "Within hours we had a GUI replacement for our IBM i green screens", using Presto. I think PSC/400, HATS / Webfacing make similar claims. I gather that Profound Logic, Look Software, Lansa offer some sort of automated migration too, correct?

Should we change the column to read "Automated Migration of Green Screens"?

-Nathan

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Web Enabling Applications - new Wiki page , Charles Wilt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.