Seems to me that since it was created as a simple list for "Web GUI Development Options", this is fair game for just about anything.
Better to have more available options rather than less.
Now if someone wants to start breaking it down, then the complexity begins.
Keep it simple :-)
Regards,
Richard Schoen
RJS Software Systems Inc.
Where Information Meets Innovation
Document Management, Workflow, Report Delivery, Forms and Business Intelligence
Email: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web Site:
http://www.rjssoftware.com
Tel: (952) 736-5800
Fax: (952) 736-5801
Toll Free: (888) RJSSOFT
----------------------------------------------------------------------
message: 1
date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 01:18:16 +0000
from: "Dean, Robert" <rdean@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [WEB400] Web Enabling Applications - new Wiki page
The matrix already feels overloaded, and I think there's some confusion between options. Some are languages, some are frameworks, and some are IDEs. Personally, one quibble that I have is that I don't think IDE's should be specifically listed. The more general-purpose IDEs like Rational SDP, Visual Studio, NetBeans, etc., are usable in support of dozens upon dozens of frameworks.
midrange.com
