Re: Subsystem and Apache Setup for Zend Server 6

[Jim Oberholtzer <midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Correct.

Jim Oberholtzer
Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects

On 8/13/13 1:07 PM, Michael Ryan wrote:
> Routing entries pointing to the pool identifier, right?
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Jim Oberholtzer <
> midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > >Yes, the Zend Server and the HTTP server should be in the same memory.
> > >
> > >Make sure to check the routing entries to be sure the memory is being
> > >used as you expect it.
> > >
> > >Jim Oberholtzer
> > >Chief Technical Architect
> > >Agile Technology Architects
> > >
> > >On 8/13/13 12:40 PM, Michael Ryan wrote:
> > > > >Jim - I set up a new *SHRPOOL entry and changed the ZENDSVR6 subsystem to
> > > > >use that shared pool:
> > > > >
> > > > >Subsystem description:   ZENDSVR6       Status:   ACTIVE
> > > > >
> > > > >Pool        Storage     Activity
> > > > >   ID        Size (K)      Level
> > > > >    1       *SHRPOOL6
> > > > >
> > > > >Are you saying that I should change the QHTTPSVR subsystem to use the
> > >same
> > > > >shared pool? And that I should change the Activity Level for the pool
> > > > >definition in the SBSD to 200?
> > > > >
> > > > >Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Jim Oberholtzer <
> > > > >midrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > >> >If you move QHTTPSVR subsystem and it's jobs into a shared memory pool,
> > > > > > >> >make sure to move the ZendSvr subsystem into that same memory. The Zend
> > > > > > >> >server uses memory in very specific ways that make the two sets of jobs
> > > > > > >> >need to run in the same memory.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >I think that is a very good thing to do, but they have to go together.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >As far as the shared pools vs. fixed memory pool, stay with a shared
> > > > > > >> >pools and set the paging option to *CALC. Threads will be about 200 to
> > > > > > >> >start depending on how many Apache servers are running.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >Jim Oberholtzer
> > > > > > >> >Chief Technical Architect
> > > > > > >> >Agile Technology Architects
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >On 8/13/13 9:03 AM, Michael Ryan wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>> > >Hi folks -
> > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > > > > > > >>> > >Implementing a PHP solution on an E6C system. Lots of memory, lots
> > >of
> > > > > > >> >disk,
> > > > > > > > >>> > >system isn't overworked at this point. V7R1. System value QPFRADJ
> > >is set
> > > > > > >> >to
> > > > > > > > >>> > >3 (Automatic Adjustment). Default Zend Server 6 installation uses
> > >*BASE
> > > > > > > > >>> > >memory pool.
> > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > > > > > > >>> > >Zend Server performance is lousy. Much slower page load and data
> > > > > > >> >retrieval
> > > > > > > > >>> > >than the same code on the development system. Lots of Toolkit and
> > >stored
> > > > > > > > >>> > >procedure use.
> > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > > > > > > >>> > >I'm thinking that the first step would be to establish a fixed
> > >memory
> > > > > > >> >pool
> > > > > > > > >>> > >just for Zend Server, set it to *NOMAX for threads, and see how it
> > >runs.
> > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > > > > > > >>> > >What tuning recommendations, for both Apache and Zend, do you folks
> > > > > > > > >>> > >suggest? Any good documentation on this?
> > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > > > > > > >>> > >Thanks!
> > > > > > > > >>> > >--
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >--
> > >
> > >--