The term responsive is thus ambiguous and can be confusing if we don't specify the meaning intended.

Thanks for raising the point. It jogged my memory about how
"responsive" was described at http://getbootstrap.com/ which is inline
with the definition you provided.

The definition I provided previously, pertaining to the performance of
the page, was borrowed from an Angular JS tutorial. I think
"responsive" is a necessary attribute of web sites and web
applications, whether it pertains to performance, or whether it
pertains to adapting the page to the size of the screen.

While viewing http://www.nasa.gov/ in my iPad, the layout changes,
depending on whether viewed in landscape or portrait mode. More
specifically, the menu bar disappears when viewed in portrait mode.
Bootstrap is known for implementing behaviors like that.

Are JavaScript and CSS frameworks necessary to adapt pages to screen
dimensions? Are removing or hiding visual components from the display
a good thing? Or should visual elements just wrap?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.