Re: Single Page Applications -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Single Page Applications
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 08:33:58 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

A comparison of EXT JS and Angular (that uses two different models) can be
found here:

http://www.techferry.com/articles/ExtJS-vs-AngularJS.html

Henrik, there was a lot of good information in your post. I was
especially impressed with the Ext JS vs. Angular JS comparison. When
new terms or acronyms enter mainstream vocabulary such as REST or SPA,
people may lose focus of some big issues pertaining to application
development.

The term "single page application" has gained some meaning. But the
nitty-gritty (the details) of application development often reveal a
broad set of criteria to measure frameworks against.

I'm curious now how this discussion might evolve. Should we continue
discussing single page applications, or take a detour to client-side
frameworks?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.