Re: Single Page Applications -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Single Page Applications
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:16:16 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Kevin,

Something Joe Pluta used to say has stuck with me. Speaking in the context
of frameworks, particularly Java-based, he would note differences between
programmers who were "class builders" vs. others who might be "class
consumers". Some may be framework builders while others may be application
builders.

Lately, I have had an interest in "single page applications" and
"responsive UI design". I have been reviewing those kinds of frameworks. My
biggest gripe is that every client-side framework I have ever become
acquainted with was overly-scoped IMHO.

What is a feature-rich UI? Is that different from a feature-rich
application? Included in Polymer is a checkbox input element which displays
a little animation effect when clicked. Is that a feature-rich UI?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Single Page Applications , Jon Paris
Re: Single Page Applications , Kevin Turner

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.