Re: Home page options for Apache on IBMi -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Home page options for Apache on IBMi
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:22:52 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I agree about persistence...
Users yell when their sessions timeout...

Sorry for derailing the original topic. That was not my intent. I have
never used persistent CGI. But any site that is totally stateless is also
void functionality and likely performs poorly too.

The best performing and most functional sites may maintain state in
QZDASOINIT or QSQSRVR jobs, or possibly ILE jobs which process requests
coming in on data queues, or some similar architecture.

Why characterize "stateless" as an advantage? It's certainly not a panacea.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Home page options for Apache on IBMi , Henrik Rützou

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.