I recognize this technique, but, due to my knowledge of node being limited at best, I have to wonder if this is an appropriate technique using node. That is, since Node is event driven, should there be a need to wait, and then loop around and check conditions again. RPG is not event driven, hence the need for such a loop. But I was under the impression that Node already incorporates this event loop and will call the appropriate function when the event occurs. I would expect to have to register to receive the event in some way, but not to have to code the event loop.

Mark Murphy
STAR BASE Consulting, Inc.
mmurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


-----Kevin Turner <kevin.turner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: -----
To: "Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries)" <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Kevin Turner <kevin.turner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 10/11/2015 04:44PM
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Why does node's Toolkit for i, use a database connection to execute CL commands?

That's interesting stuff - thanks. I'm not entirely sure how to dig deeper but I will try :)

On 11 Oct 2015, at 17:47, Richard Schoen <Richard.Schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I wonder if the loop is forcing a new job start each time on the i.

With XMLCGI, there is an IPC service that takes a few seconds each time it's re-initiated and I could see this being intensive if you had to create a new session for each interaction.

You can start the IPC session with a unique name and use the same job over and over if I want to maintain state and use the same job on the I which should improve performance I think.

Not sure how the node toolkit works, but this works good with .Net and should be similar depending on how the toolkit was implemented.

Regards,

Richard Schoen | Director of Document Management Technologies, HelpSystems
T: + 1 952-486-6802
RJS Software Systems | A Division of HelpSystems
richard.schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.rjssoftware.com
Visit me on: Twitter | LinkedIn
----------------------------------------------------------------------

message: 1
date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:32:23 +0000
from: Kevin Turner <kevin.turner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [WEB400] Why does node's Toolkit for i, use a database
connection to execute CL commands?

It may or may not be of interest or relevant, but we have lots of code that sits and waits of data on a keyed data queue. It waits for 5 seconds then loops round and checks some stuff (like an instruction to end) then waits again.

When I did the same in a node app using itoolkit, the LPAR simply died on its feet. It wasn't obvious why because the node app was not showing up as using much CPU. However it certainly was the culprit - I changed to wait for 60 seconds instead as it wasn't essential to loop every 5 secs. The problem went away.

On 10 Oct 2015, at 15:58, Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/web400.


___________________________________________
This email has been scanned by iomartcloud.
http://www.iomartcloud.com/


________________________________

NOTICE: The information in this electronic mail transmission is intended by CoralTree Systems Ltd for the use of the named individuals or entity to which it is directed and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by reply email or by telephone, so that the sender's address records can be corrected.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


CoralTree Systems Limited
25 Barnes Wallis Road
Segensworth East, Fareham
PO15 5TT

Company Registration Number 5021022.
Registered Office:
12-14 Carlton Place
Southampton, UK
SO15 2EA
VAT Registration Number 834 1020 74.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.