Re: Hosting a Large Number of Node Apps on the IBM i -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Hosting a Large Number of Node Apps on the IBM i
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:03:52 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I agree there are two topics. I was wondering whether or not there might
be some decisions about routing strategies that impact the ability to scale
apps.

Okay, but the two topics are both under the general topic of "routing".

1. Perform "routing" in a server external to Node.js?
2. Perform "routing" in Node.js?
3. Perform "routing" in Node.js but fork a child process instead of doing
"routing" in the main event loop?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.