Re: List Tables For A Schema... Not Working -- WEB400

Subject: Re: List Tables For A Schema... Not Working
From: CRPence <crpbottle@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:23:27 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On 19-Nov-2015 13:53 -0600, Vernon Hamberg wrote:

<<SNIP>> Chuck's response surprised me and is not his usual amazingly
helpful style. Fact is, we hardly ever think of catalogs. We work
with schemas (libraries in IBM i parlance), then down through tables
and views and indexes and all, then columns <<SNIP>>

I was reviling the "IBM" for having responded to an IBM i question, specifically using a parlance that [in my experience] would befuddle most IBM DB2 for i folk. No help was offered, because that was not the purpose for my reply; the intent was more like shaming the nameless "IBM" for what was offered to explain an entity hierarchy for the DB2 for i, using a term that is almost never used for [that purpose with] the DB2 for i. IOW, I should not have replied, because the reply was entirely Off Topic 8^Q

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.