On 30-Nov-2015 17:38 -0600, Buck Calabro wrote:
SQLCOLUMNS does not appear to understand 'Column Heading'.
Look at <ed: SYSCOLUMNS> instead to see the results of LABEL ON.

Looking at the ODBC catalogue page <ed: SQLCOLUMNS VIEW>
[http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/ssw_ibm_i_72/db2/rbafzcatsqlcolumns.htm]
I see that REMARKS is intended to be set via COMMENT, but
COLUMN_HEADING makes no mention of how that is supposed to be set.

I see the text "A character string supplied with the COMMENT statement." for REMARKS. However...

I was unable to find any reference to either COLUMN_HEADING [or LABEL] in the SQLCOLUMNS docs on that [above] link. I presumed possibly, the reference to COLUMN_HEADING applied to what was found in the following link instead of what was found in the preceding link. But then, when reviewing the docs on that [below] link, there I found the text "A character string supplied with the LABEL statement (column headings)" for COLUMN_HEADING. Call me confused.?.?

Hmm, thinking on this further, reading back to the OP, I infer more likely, is that COLUMN_HEADING [in above quoted text] was meant to be COLUMN_TEXT. And while SQLCOLUMNS docs fails to include the [somewhat expected for consistency] text "A character string supplied with the LABEL statement (column text)", given that column is merely indirection from COLUMN_TEXT of SYSCOLUMNS, I went looking at that doc [next URL in the quoted text] to find that indeed the [omitted short name LABELTEXT FOR] COLUMN_TEXT includes exactly that above\expected text "A character string supplied with the LABEL statement (column text)".

FWiW, that definition of that SQLCOLUMNS catalog VIEW may need an enhancement, *if* the level of ODBC the OS is intended to be support for beyond ODBC 1.0, per my comment:

[http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/201510/msg00683.html]
"Since ODBC 1.0 <ed: there> was added the SQL_DESC_LABEL to the sqlColAttribute function. AIUI, that data correlates directly to the effect of the LABEL ON COLUMN ... IS statement's string-constant data; i.e. the "LABEL" [aka COLUMN_HEADING] from SYSCOLUMNS."

And from that same archived reply, I suggested that possibly "IIRC, the sqlColumns() API results from IBM i drivers originally [and likely still do] effect for the REMARKS, the expression of COALESCE(remarks, labeltext, "LABEL") against SYSCOLUMNS catalog data. Therefore the TEXT() and COLHDG() *may* have value to requests made from elsewhere, if\when there was no COMMENT ON COLUMN done for that particular COLUMN_NAME." I wonder if the effect I recall, instead might have been, that the effect for the COLUMN_TEXT was reflected as what would be effectively COALESCE(labeltext, "LABEL") against SYSCOLUMNS data.?

Perhaps someone can persuade IBM to update SQLCOLUMNS to make such a change [e.g. TRIM(COALESCE(COLUMN_TEXT,"LABEL")) AS COLUMN_TEXT], and\or update that VIEW to reflect the more recent ODBC specification for which "LABEL" [perhaps named DESC_LABEL] is included. FWiW, either the docs for SQLCOLUMNS are incorrect already anyhow per a failure to reflect all of the VARGRAPHIC updates to the based-on VIEW SYSCOLUMNS, or the SQLCOLUMNS is incorrect because the VIEW does not reflect the docs. Someone could submit a comment on the docs to get them to /correct/ one and\or the other for proper reflection of what should be expected on the system, and even include a /suggestion/ about the SQL_DESC_LABEL which if not provided explicitly could be provided in a COALESCE of the COLUMN_TEXT data.


Looking at the DB2 for i catalogue page <ed: SYSCOLUMNS VIEW>
[http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/ssw_ibm_i_72/db2/rbafzcatsyscol.htm]
I see that LONG_COMMENT is intended to be set via COMMENT and
COLUMN_HEADING is intended to be set via LABEL.

Notable: the short field name [not provided in those docs] for LONG_COMMENT is REMARKS, for COLUMN_TEXT is LABELTEXT, and for COLUMN_HEADING is LABEL.


For completeness, the ISO catalogue <ed: COLUMNS VIEW>
[http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/ssw_ibm_i_72/db2/rbafzcatcolumns.htm]
does not appear to have either of those columns.

I am at 7.2.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.