On 11-Jan-2016 09:30 -0700, Aaron Bartell wrote:
The non-conventional /quoting/ that has been used in replying
Are you talking about mine or yours? No need to be passive
aggressive. Call me out so I can fix it.

Ignore the comment. The top-posted faux in-line replies [yet with full replied-to content included at the bottom] are an issue for this reader, not for the poster; I am the one who failed to keep my use of /script/ maintained in the context of the original /script/ [and its output] that was provided in an earlier post in the thread. I need not have confused the issue, by trying to explain _why_ I mucked-up the content; I need only have stated the /script/ to which I referred was accidentally omitted.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.