Re: alternative to <iframe> -- WEB400

Subject: Re: alternative to <iframe>
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:16:18 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

that is actually a bad solution to use HTTPAPI for displaying foreign sites
because any reference to any gif or jpg that isn't qualified to the site
must also reside in your domain. The same goes for href's.

Point taken, Henrik. I understand the constraints. iframes are the more
appropriate alternative, generally. The "PCI scan" alluded to in the
original post sounds more like a "PCI scam".

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.