Re: Not a CGI program -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Not a CGI program
From: Mark S Waterbury <mark.s.waterbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 16:03:23 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Justin:

Developers should never deploy any objects into a "live" production environment that are owned by any "developer" user profile. All such objects in production should be owned by an appropriate "application owning profile" or at least, something like QPGMR.

If you use a change management tool or product to control installing changes into the "live" production environment, that would typically take care of this sort of thing for you, automatically. ("Set it, and forget it.")

HTH,

Mark S. Waterbury

> On 8/8/2016 3:42 PM, Justin Taylor wrote:

The other dev is back today, so I've been able to resume my testing.

It doesn't matter who compiles the *PGM object, but rather who owns the object. If the other dev owns the object, it won't run once deployed. I can change the owner of the deployed object to me, and then it does run.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Not a CGI program , Justin Taylor

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.