Re: Apache vs Express for Node -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Apache vs Express for Node
From: Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:16:14 +0000
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

The CGI service allows the file upload directly. Having the file transfer separate from the program call is one of the reasons for moving away from DB2 stored procedure calls.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Andelin [mailto:nandelin@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 12:08 AM
To: Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) <web400@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [WEB400] Apache vs Express for Node

I realized my web services have to support file uploads. That may
limit my options.

Why would that limit your options? Couldn't your web-service clients simply reference one web server or another depending on which was hosting a file-upload service, or not?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Apache vs Express for Node , Nathan Andelin

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.