Richard

EXTJS has gone from an idealistic product to a venture financed product
(Sequoia Capital) to now just another product in a bigger portfolio at
Idera Inc. At the same time venture capital vent in the original designers
(Jack Slocum and others) vent out.

Like AngularJS vs. Angular2+ there was a major change between version 3.x
and 4+ requiring rewrite and with 4+ they introduced a new licensing scheme
that made the product very expensive and not suited to be included in Open
Source since every installation/developer has to have a license.

At the same time EXTJS has no critical mass in the market. Job offerings
requiring EXTJS skills are fairly rear which mean the EXTJS like RPGLE is a
“no go” skill if you ask any IT-career planning consultant or any consult
that works with sort time contract engagements.

The Sencha products are brilliant especially as UI framework for
workstation-based enterprise applications, but that really doesn’t matter,
CPM was better than DOS, OS/2 better that Windows, SNA better that TCP, IBM
I (OS/400) better than Windows etc. but DOS/Windows/TCP/Windows was the
winners.

So, the bottom line is not a technical issue but more a market driven issue
that has caused me to move away.


On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:44 PM, Richard Schoen <
Richard.Schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Henrik,

What's your reasoning for moving away from ExtJS/Sencha ?

It's mainly Javascript but looks interesting if you want to lock in to
their way of doing things.

Regards,

Richard Schoen
Director of Document Management
e. richard.schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
p. 952.486.6802
w. helpsystems.com
------------------------------

message: 4
date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 23:22:35 +0100
from: Henrik R?tzou <hr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: [WEB400] [EXTERNAL] Re: Express, React, Node.JS

Kevin, comming from EXTJS that basically has no HTML but only javascript
component objects, Angular is HTML template driven while REACT uses HTML
imbedded in javascript that in an EXTJS perspective both sucks.
Unfortunately EXTJS isn't an option anymore because of licensing and lack
of critical mass. And as most javascript frameworks moving from EXTJS 3.x
to 4+ requires a more or less total rewrite.

Personal I'm not the great believer in "whatever floats my boat strategies"
by flipping the coin between a lot of technologies every morning, the real
fun for me comes when I enters the higher level of a single technology
instead of knowing the basics in many - but that is just me.


On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 8:59 PM, Kevin <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

That?s correct. And I think I am right in saying that Angular is HTML
centric whereas React is JavaScript centric. By that I mean one uses
directives to augment HTML and the other has elements of HTML embedded
in JavaScript. Whatever floats your boat....

On 26 Feb 2018, at 15:35, Henrik R?tzou <hr@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I think that was true between AngularJS and Angular2+ but not
between
2,3,4,5
--
This is the Web Enabling the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (WEB400) mailing
list
To post a message email: WEB400@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400
or email: WEB400-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/web400.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.