Re: Rise of Node -- WEB400

Subject: Re: Rise of Node
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:45:04 -0600
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/web400/>
List-help: <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "Web Enabling the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <web400.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:web400@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/web400>, <mailto:web400-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I wonder the reason for the assertion that shops are "moving away" from ILE
languages, rather than integrating with ILE languages on IBM i? Sure, some
shops may be using scripting languages to generate formatted responses to
requests from browsers and web-service clients, but still integrating with
IBM i stored procedures, triggers, and user defined functions? And using
ILE languages for batch and background processes? A separation of
responsibilities? A shift in application architecture that includes both?

Is there really a case to be made for Node doing it all?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Rise of Node , Bradley Stone

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.